Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 9:54:37 GMT -6
Oops... I hope they have witnesses. GOOD ones. Unimpeachable ones. This looks bad...and I wouldn't have said that until reading about the autopsy findings.
This is the original story...and you may want to skim over it for the details of Officer condition and the conditions at the scene when this happened, before seeing the smoking artillery piece in the autopsy report.
Original Shooting reported in August
To read that article..it's a bit confusing. Cops have hardly a scratch. A man, unarmed and apparently with mental issues to boot, is dead on the pavement. Thats all anyone knew then..and they mention in that first article, how they were being closed lipped then. Something about "a gathering" at the scene.
yeah..a gathering of guilty conscience, perhaps.
(emphasis added)
And how do they describe this happening? After all..the cops must have SOME explanation right? Oh...this truly does fall into the "We had to say SOMETHING" category, in my opinion.
Source
How many here have been in physical confrontations and outright fights, outside childhood, and where the result really mattered to your own personal future?
Picture what this article is asking the public to believe happened. The cop is said to be pinned or under the bad guy...reaches down for his backup weapon ..and ...this is where it gets outright twilight zone weird.
....he reached around and fired BACK AT HIMSELF through the other guy?
?
Umm.... WOW..... HELLO?! This might be a shocker to some, but cops don't get to carry hollow point bullets, and damn sure not a Southern Ca. department, the last I heard anything about it. They have round nose that has penetration problems viagra can't fix. They tend to OVER penetrate..and any cop would know that like a basic fact of life.
Bullets also do weird things and deflect all over when going into a person's chest. Bones all over the place..and any one of them could deflect a round 90 degrees from path of travel to blow even a 'aiming at an angle' concept to pull this shot off without basically accepting better than a 50/50 chance you'd shoot yourself as the second strike.
Really.. they figure we'll believe a point blank contact wound..TO THE BACK...came as they describe it? How long did they have to work on coming up with something to 'fit' the physical reality at the scene? This had to have taxed the brain power of cops to accomplish.
This is the original story...and you may want to skim over it for the details of Officer condition and the conditions at the scene when this happened, before seeing the smoking artillery piece in the autopsy report.
Original Shooting reported in August
To read that article..it's a bit confusing. Cops have hardly a scratch. A man, unarmed and apparently with mental issues to boot, is dead on the pavement. Thats all anyone knew then..and they mention in that first article, how they were being closed lipped then. Something about "a gathering" at the scene.
yeah..a gathering of guilty conscience, perhaps.
Among the findings: The 25-year-old was shot three times, including once in the back. And that wound was surrounded by a muzzle imprint, Ford's autopsy report shows.
And how do they describe this happening? After all..the cops must have SOME explanation right? Oh...this truly does fall into the "We had to say SOMETHING" category, in my opinion.
Ford ended up on top of the officer, with Ford in control of the officer's pistol, the police chief said.
"The officer drew his backup gun and reached over Mr. Ford's back and shot Mr. Ford in very close proximity -- possibly, probably the cause of the muzzle imprint that's mentioned in the coroner's report," Beck said.
"The officer drew his backup gun and reached over Mr. Ford's back and shot Mr. Ford in very close proximity -- possibly, probably the cause of the muzzle imprint that's mentioned in the coroner's report," Beck said.
How many here have been in physical confrontations and outright fights, outside childhood, and where the result really mattered to your own personal future?
Picture what this article is asking the public to believe happened. The cop is said to be pinned or under the bad guy...reaches down for his backup weapon ..and ...this is where it gets outright twilight zone weird.
....he reached around and fired BACK AT HIMSELF through the other guy?
?Umm.... WOW..... HELLO?! This might be a shocker to some, but cops don't get to carry hollow point bullets, and damn sure not a Southern Ca. department, the last I heard anything about it. They have round nose that has penetration problems viagra can't fix. They tend to OVER penetrate..and any cop would know that like a basic fact of life.
Bullets also do weird things and deflect all over when going into a person's chest. Bones all over the place..and any one of them could deflect a round 90 degrees from path of travel to blow even a 'aiming at an angle' concept to pull this shot off without basically accepting better than a 50/50 chance you'd shoot yourself as the second strike.
Really.. they figure we'll believe a point blank contact wound..TO THE BACK...came as they describe it? How long did they have to work on coming up with something to 'fit' the physical reality at the scene? This had to have taxed the brain power of cops to accomplish.