Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2014 11:23:08 GMT -6
Oh..still my beating heart. They actually mislead and are deceptive to each other? (gasp of total shock and horror)
Whoda thunk it?
That is quite a thing to admit to, in such blind pursuit of political hash and trash. I don't think he even realizes what he's saying there. Saying about himself..and about the system. Lets see, shall we?
First, this is about the vote to allow the recent spending bill up for House debate. A procedural vote that is still critical to allow a bill to ever get to a general vote at all. In other words, people acting differently at that stage would have killed the piece of garbage before it could be passed by both Houses of Congress.
....and here, ladies and gentlemen, is where the specimen we're looking at today acts against its own self interest! Note the casual way it admits to supporting something it was against, yet seemed a good idea at the moment 'since it can't go further anyway'. (I refer to him as an IT here, because he is interchangeable with ever other IT on 'The Hill'. Over 500 of ITs...in at least two colors). I'll bet it even uttered the famous words "but...I didn't think...." followed by some silly excuse afterward.
Why take responsibility for a lack of belief in anything like values or principles .....when we can blame others and say we were deceived into being scumbags?
Source
So...he kinda makes a habit of doing precisely the WRONG thing, at the worst moment to see average people screwed as a result? Maybe other work would be better for the lad? Something in telemarketing or debt collection, perhaps? He sounds quite skilled at trading his principles for bad ideas. He'd fit right in!
Whoda thunk it?
For a member of Congress to accuse his party leaders of lying to him, and for their aides to return the favor, is about as rare as the drama that surrounded last week’s procedural vote — a vote that led to the passage of the $1.1 trillion spending bill.
That is quite a thing to admit to, in such blind pursuit of political hash and trash. I don't think he even realizes what he's saying there. Saying about himself..and about the system. Lets see, shall we?
First, this is about the vote to allow the recent spending bill up for House debate. A procedural vote that is still critical to allow a bill to ever get to a general vote at all. In other words, people acting differently at that stage would have killed the piece of garbage before it could be passed by both Houses of Congress.
That’s the situation Representative Marlin Stutzman (R., Ind.) found himself in last week after he lent his support to the spending package at a moment when it seemed unlikely to ever receive a final vote.
....and here, ladies and gentlemen, is where the specimen we're looking at today acts against its own self interest! Note the casual way it admits to supporting something it was against, yet seemed a good idea at the moment 'since it can't go further anyway'. (I refer to him as an IT here, because he is interchangeable with ever other IT on 'The Hill'. Over 500 of ITs...in at least two colors). I'll bet it even uttered the famous words "but...I didn't think...." followed by some silly excuse afterward.
Why take responsibility for a lack of belief in anything like values or principles .....when we can blame others and say we were deceived into being scumbags?
Stutzman worked with Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) last October in an attempt to defund Obamacare by attaching the proposal to a must-pass spending bill that funded the rest of government, despite leadership’s initial hesitance to pick a fight over defunding Obamacare.
So...he kinda makes a habit of doing precisely the WRONG thing, at the worst moment to see average people screwed as a result? Maybe other work would be better for the lad? Something in telemarketing or debt collection, perhaps? He sounds quite skilled at trading his principles for bad ideas. He'd fit right in!