Brazil is the second largest GMO producer and user of agri-chemicals, including glyphosate ando thers that have been banned, in world. The rush to blame it on mosquitoes is beginning to look like a Monsanto/government false flag and cover-up, IMO.
The facts, compared to the 'evidence' we're being given aren't adding up. It reminds me of the Ebola panic of recent times....
I like the interview. The guy with the beard is level headed and has researched the validity of the evidence. He states the evidence and says all the hype that is going around is unfounded. I didn't realize there were 25000 cases of micro-encephalephy in the US a year. That alone is actually over two thousand cases a month. The evidence showing four hundred something cases in Brazil is not that bad. It sounds like the cases are up there, but I doubt if it is the mosquito virus after listening to the evidence. It could be, but the evidence does not show it.
I research evidence all the time and I see many times that the evidence is misinterpretted to fit into someone's desired theory. Half the time they are not even on the right road, let alone close to their destination
It is all being blown up to make us fear everything, the more people who are worried, the more dependent we are on those providing medicines and these sciences. I am not worried, I look at it as a challenge to find the truth. There is still a possibility in my mind that the tdap vaccine could cause this. By training the immune system to look at the three threats covered by the DTAP, it could pull away the immune system looking at the Zika, or the adjuvant of the vaccine could be stimulating the immune response against the Zika and causing an over response to the immune system leading to birth defects in the children.
It could also be any of the chemicals sprayed in the area. This hype with the Zika could just be a coincidence. Who knows, all the chemicals sprayed there can also be mutating the virus for all I know.
I did some research on this and the numbers of the cases of microcephaly are all over the place. According to a couple of sources, there are between 2 and 12 cases of babies born with this in the USA every year. Approximately 4 million births. So that means there are between 800 and 4800 born with it each year. Many more acquire it for many reasons after birth. Anything diagnosed within a month after birth seems to be considered birth.
Then, there is acquired microcephaly and those numbers increase a lot, they can go probably as high as 25000 total kids that is reported on a couple of other sites. Now there seems to be a lot of possible reasons after birth that these defects can be caused. Of course vaccines is not even being considered, it is always the fault of the parents or accidents or illnesses. The numbers have not really changed much over the last forty or more years yet vaccines have increased a lot. The rate in the UK is about 2 in 10,000 which remains at the lowest end of the US figures. The US would average at least six per 10,000 if you were to average the 2 and 12 but I do not know if that is the case.
Now this is an article from a foundation which is trying to get funding. childrenwithmicro.org/ I think this might take into account all of the acquired cases too. Here is another one with the same number.http://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions-and-treatments/conditions/microcephaly. But I am also questioning what it means by effecting that many kids. The CDC site states the 2-12 per ten thousand too. www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/microcephaly.html And that is births, not acquired.
So the birth rate in Brazil is just under three million in the year, or three quarters of the US rate. Seems like they are busier there.data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=SOWC&f=inID%3A75 So the number of cases of this disease at four hundred something seems pretty normal considering the conditions are worse in that country for people than here in the US or the UK. Just the fact of the weather is much warmer and the environment has more parasites because of that means that the rate should be a little higher.
So the numbers of 4000+ babies could actually be right also if you were to consider the acquired total added to the numbers, sort of like they do here in the US some places. Now the twenty five thousand number seems to be treated cases total, I suppose they could be helping these kids for five or six years. I would guess the total number of birth and acquired disease in the US at probably six to ten thousand a year here in the US. But the total of all new diagnoses could actually be twenty five thousand a year, that might include those who's sutures of the skull set prematurely or diseases later than a year old.
I'm just trying to figure out why the big descrepency in the numbers shown.
I couldn't agree more with all that's been said here. The BBC in the UK are BANGING away at EVERY OPPURTUNITY about the "LINK" between Zika Virus and Microcephaly, and the Mosquitos... but they have presented NO EVIDENCE of a link whatsoever. There are a few cases (17?) out of all those tested, which MAY have Zika present too, but this fact almost DISPROVES the link, as the VAST MAJORITY of cases of microcephaly show NO PRESENCE of Zika Virus!
My suspicions still lie in the direction of Oxitec and their GMO mosquito releases in Brazil and elsewhere (just before the number of cases of microcephaly spiked). G
I was talking about this with some friends over the week end! I hadnt even seen/read anything about this other than hearing others talking and tone of the first thing I said was "Well looka here, andother vaccination campaing on the way! Remeber H1N1?"
My friend replied that there is no vaccine for this one!
"Oh there will be!" they gotta rank up the trillions right?
its all about population controll and money money money!
my 2 cents
You don't have a soul. You are a soul, you have a body!
The CDC and other health organizations are actually still accumulating data in regards to the potential link between microcephaly and Zika. Recently, the CDC found 9 US women who were infected with Zika and pregnant. Miscarriages and birth defects were found in 5 of the 9 women. One of the 5 children potentially impacted by Zika was born microcephalic. There are 10 more pregnant US women who are suspected cases as well.
French Polynesia has also had cases of microcephaly as well as miscarriages and other birth defects as well.
The link between Zika and the microcephaly is still suspected and not necessarily proven as being absolutely related yet. For every Zika infected pregnancy that has a microcephalic birth as an outcome, it becomes more evidence, especially if it has occurred outside of Brazil. Viral infections in the first term of pregnancy are known to cause birth defects so that is one of the reasons for the suspected link. The other is that 2 babies who were microcephalic and had died at birth were autopsied showed the presence of the Zika virus in their brain tissues.
It's really very sad and hopefully they will figure out what is going on for sure here as if it is related to A. aegypti and the Zika virus, it's not good.
The thing is that the Zika virus is not new, it has been around for quite a while. The levels of microcephaly along with the Zika are increasing though. But not nearly as much together as they are saying they are. From the news release from the CDC I watched it stated that most of the kids of the woman who's husbands had Zika had microcephaly, but it did not state that the woman were proven to have the disease. In other words, no antigens in the blood to Zika it sounds like. Those antigens are present for years.
The wording on the newscast excluded the statement that the women actually had the disease. Since all of the other info was exact, I do think exclusion does mean something in this case. I listen carefully to things. Now that was just one CDC spokesman, maybe there is evidence out there that can show they did flunk the blood test.
Last Edit: Mar 2, 2016 23:20:14 GMT -6 by rickymouse
