Post by omegalogos on Sept 9, 2015 1:47:12 GMT -6
Explanation: Mood Music 1st ... Because this is going to get swampy ...
Caution: Contains banjo's ... at your own risk ok!
Iron Horse - Rocket Man (bluegrass cover) [youtube.com]
Ok OL what the hell is the bloody go with "Sub-luminal Space Swimming Safety Science!" and "Swimming In Space Lessons! But Light Is A Drag, So Wear VantaBlack Swimsuits!" ?
Well here is the breakdown ...
Sub-luminal means any speed slower than the speed of light! [Don't get it confused with 'subliminal' ok!]
Space Swimming is exactly what it says and I get to the science of that below so just tread water for now ok!
Safety Science is also exactly what it says and this thread is for everybody's safety so wear vantablack ok!
Here is the science ...
Swimming Through Empty Space [science20.com]
An article in the latest (August 2009) edition of Scientific American describes an astronaut floating motionless with respect to his distant spaceship. He is not tethered to the spaceship and has no objects available that can be hurled away or can in some other way create a thrust.
How is he ever going to make it back to his spaceship?
His situation seems hopeless. However, he remembers the lessons he received as rookie astronaut on swimming in empty space. By applying a weird degenerative form of breaststroke the astronaut slowly moves toward the spaceship and makes it safely back before he runs out of oxygen.
Swimming in Space
What to think of this? Repetitive flexing of his muscles causing an astronaut to move through empty space? Swimming without pushing against anything or being pushed by anything? Sounds unbelievable? Literal bootstrapping in a mediocre science fiction scenario? Surely since Newton we know that neither Baron Von Munchausen nor anyone else can pull himself up by his own bootstraps!
Well, think again. MIT professor Jack Wisdom did demonstrate in a paper published in 2003 in Science that it is possible to translate a deformable body solely by applying internal forces.
So you ask: if that is so, why can't we lift ourselves up and breaststroke through the sky? Well, the issue is that professor Wisdom's 'breaststroke' is not particularly effective to overcome earth's gravity, as it relies on the local curvature of spacetime. This curvature is very small, and its effects are hardly noticable in everyday life and over small distances. Yet, since Einstein we know that spacetime is curved due to the presence of mass in the universe.
Distant stars and planets bend spacetime and create a non-Euclidean geometry. Would one measure the sum of the angles of a giant triangle formed in space, these angles would not add up to 180 degress as Euclidean geometry stipulates. It is precisely this deviation from the flat Euclidean geometry that enables swimming through a vacuum.
How is he ever going to make it back to his spaceship?
His situation seems hopeless. However, he remembers the lessons he received as rookie astronaut on swimming in empty space. By applying a weird degenerative form of breaststroke the astronaut slowly moves toward the spaceship and makes it safely back before he runs out of oxygen.
Swimming in Space
What to think of this? Repetitive flexing of his muscles causing an astronaut to move through empty space? Swimming without pushing against anything or being pushed by anything? Sounds unbelievable? Literal bootstrapping in a mediocre science fiction scenario? Surely since Newton we know that neither Baron Von Munchausen nor anyone else can pull himself up by his own bootstraps!
Well, think again. MIT professor Jack Wisdom did demonstrate in a paper published in 2003 in Science that it is possible to translate a deformable body solely by applying internal forces.
So you ask: if that is so, why can't we lift ourselves up and breaststroke through the sky? Well, the issue is that professor Wisdom's 'breaststroke' is not particularly effective to overcome earth's gravity, as it relies on the local curvature of spacetime. This curvature is very small, and its effects are hardly noticable in everyday life and over small distances. Yet, since Einstein we know that spacetime is curved due to the presence of mass in the universe.
Distant stars and planets bend spacetime and create a non-Euclidean geometry. Would one measure the sum of the angles of a giant triangle formed in space, these angles would not add up to 180 degress as Euclidean geometry stipulates. It is precisely this deviation from the flat Euclidean geometry that enables swimming through a vacuum.
Please view source article to get the full story and to watch the short video ok!
So we can swim through space by exploiting our own movable geometry and the local curvature of space time to translate positions and move through space [also gaining momentum as we went].
But light is a drag ...
Casimir Effect [wiki]
Which pushes plates together or apart using virtual particles and photons when the plates are very close together proving that light filled space [light IS space] can have a drag impact on physical objects and I think that it proves the Luminiferous 'aether' [wiki] better than the Michelson-Morley Experiment [hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu] results do.
Also Solar Sails [wiki] again prove that light has a physical push/drag affects on momentum and direction.
We swim through a light field which IS the very fabric of space time.
Photons are a Drag! [physics.aps.org]
Any object in motion feels a bit of friction as it moves through the sea of radiation that is constantly emitted by its surroundings.
Glowing cosmos. Any object in motion should feel a tiny slowing force from the sea of light emitted by its surroundings. The glow from the big bang might have slowed hot debris and affected the early evolution of the Universe.
There’s no escape from friction. Objects moving through a vacuum or even interstellar space feel a universal drag from the photons that are everywhere, according to the 28 November PRL. Although the drag is tiny, the researchers believe it may alter cosmologists’ estimates of the time it took for atoms to coalesce after the big bang. But some cosmologists say the effect, although real, is not relevant to cosmology.
Bring two pieces of metal close enough together, and they will almost always attract or repel one another, even in a vacuum, thanks to the Casimir effect. This minute force comes from virtual photons–particles of light–that continually flit in and out of existence. The effect leads to friction as one chunk of metal moves past another. Rudi Podgornik, of the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, and his colleagues imagined taking away the second chunk, and wondered what the remaining piece of metal would experience simply moving through space.
Their calculations show that a lone object in motion experiences friction. It comes from the sea of real photons emitted by everything around it. Night vision goggles prove that any warm body emits infrared light, but even frigid intergalactic space is awash in microwave photons that would gradually slow a drifting space traveler. The friction occurs because the moving object absorbs more photons at its front surface than at its rear. The object slows from the flow of photons, just as a cyclist is slowed by the wind she feels in her face.
After establishing the mechanism, the team worked out exactly how long it would take various materials to slow down in different situations. A metal would feel a stronger drag than a nonmetal, Podgornik and his colleagues found, because metals can absorb light at all frequencies, unlike nonmetals. In intergalactic space, the slowing of a macroscopic object would only be noticeable over billions of years. In a 1000-degree-Kelvin oven, on the other hand, a water molecule would need less than five months to slow to a standstill, assuming it started out at the oven’s temperature
Glowing cosmos. Any object in motion should feel a tiny slowing force from the sea of light emitted by its surroundings. The glow from the big bang might have slowed hot debris and affected the early evolution of the Universe.
There’s no escape from friction. Objects moving through a vacuum or even interstellar space feel a universal drag from the photons that are everywhere, according to the 28 November PRL. Although the drag is tiny, the researchers believe it may alter cosmologists’ estimates of the time it took for atoms to coalesce after the big bang. But some cosmologists say the effect, although real, is not relevant to cosmology.
Bring two pieces of metal close enough together, and they will almost always attract or repel one another, even in a vacuum, thanks to the Casimir effect. This minute force comes from virtual photons–particles of light–that continually flit in and out of existence. The effect leads to friction as one chunk of metal moves past another. Rudi Podgornik, of the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, and his colleagues imagined taking away the second chunk, and wondered what the remaining piece of metal would experience simply moving through space.
Their calculations show that a lone object in motion experiences friction. It comes from the sea of real photons emitted by everything around it. Night vision goggles prove that any warm body emits infrared light, but even frigid intergalactic space is awash in microwave photons that would gradually slow a drifting space traveler. The friction occurs because the moving object absorbs more photons at its front surface than at its rear. The object slows from the flow of photons, just as a cyclist is slowed by the wind she feels in her face.
After establishing the mechanism, the team worked out exactly how long it would take various materials to slow down in different situations. A metal would feel a stronger drag than a nonmetal, Podgornik and his colleagues found, because metals can absorb light at all frequencies, unlike nonmetals. In intergalactic space, the slowing of a macroscopic object would only be noticeable over billions of years. In a 1000-degree-Kelvin oven, on the other hand, a water molecule would need less than five months to slow to a standstill, assuming it started out at the oven’s temperature
Now as one swims faster and faster the light one emits gets blue shifted at the front and red shifted at the rear of the vehicle and this means we need to take the hulls color into consideration and to not go around xray and gamma ray irradiating and cooking everything we head towards the best solution is a VantaBlack [wiki] graphene coating that only emits in the infrared range [1] meaning one could at least travel at 80-90% the speed of light and not kill everything in front of you for light-years around by emitting Cherenkov Radiation [wiki].
[1] Graphene Emits IR Radiation. [physicsworld.com]
Vantablack is a substance made of carbon nanotubes and is the blackest substance known, absorbing a maximum of 99.965% of radiation in the visible spectrum. It is composed of a forest of vertical tubes which are "grown". When light strikes vantablack, instead of bouncing off, it becomes trapped and is continually deflected between the tubes before eventually becoming heat.
So yeah if we wear vantablack and only emit a narrow frequency of heat /infrared radiation and that gets blueshifted via relativistic momentum into the visible range then we would not kill everything, be traveling a decent % of C and would also be able to exploit the incoming blueshifted light for power generation purposes.
Personal Disclosure: They didn't teach you that in the George Clooney 'Gravity' movie did they?
Superfruit/Pentatonix - Defying Gravity [youtube.com]
Well I am defying gravity and I just wanted to give you all a safe handup!