Jade Helm and could we be missing something?

I have found it interesting from the beginning that the exercise covers our southern border. I have felt for some time that leaving the southern border open is one of the greatest threats we have, and it appears nothing will be done until 'after the fact'.

If this is the line of thinking from the 5 sided building then it truly explains how vastly different the thinking is between them and the white house. Why push so hard for gun control from the current administration unless you want the loss to begin with? Then have your military strength train to take it back? Even at a minimum the friendlies would be cannon fodder for the military so long as they were armed or is the thinking they would be in the way and let them go down unarmed? Seems counter productive to me. The advertised mission of SF is in training and arming a resistance in which case the increased logistics of weapons delivery would be a time waster. Disarming the citizenry would appear on the surface to hinder not help SF in this task.

I am interested in your thinking here. Although this scenario is just as plausible as any other, to say the friendlies come up short would be the understatement of all time. Back up a couple of years and I ask is this then why US military trained with the Chinese in Hawaii to learn something about the tactical movement and logistics? 

Let me just pass out the tin hats while I think of this for a while. 

My thought wasn't that SF would disarm, it's the current administration seeking to disarm the citizens. SF would end up rearming the populous. That is why I find it counter productive and the difference in thinking between the WH and the P building. Maybe I didn't splain myself correctly. But O wants to disarm the republic, and then SF will have to rearm. Waste of their time and effort. 

If that makes sense... 

When you have a WH actively working at creating civil unrest, participating in payment for protesters, I would say they are advocating war yes. But war from the inside not the outside. I think this is part of the collusion of the media in that they are not reporting, at least in the main stream the ongoing tensions with China and Russia. For the watchers of these things there have been many moves as of late, some think there is even a possible technology display going on between Russia and the US with EM weapons by a recent display of Frigate missiles exploding right after launch. 

Who would have ever thought French and Germans arms companies would merge to create a very large weapons supplier. Take a look at the caption at the top of this page. You could be right with your thinking on Jade Helm. The full article is here. 

The possible EM displays. Of course speculation, but curious none the less. I know wrabbit blows off BRICSA but I think these countries wanting to leave the western financial system is at the root of these and other non MSM reported problems. We have a financial system based on military model of force, when they are not operating in conjunction with the WH we are in times of peril. We meaning the US protect world wide shipping to ensure commerce throughout the world what happens when China finishes their islands and fittings in South China Sea and decide to flex their muscles with the help of Russia? I just hope the think tanks are working over time, the global chess pieces appear to be placed challenging countries we are not prepared to counter in a crisis. Of course this is only MO but we haven't even covered NATO movements, Russian space, or the Ukraine, Japanese voting for military increase, Japanese firing a all powerful laser, China building islands, and wanting to be the next reserve currency, etc. etc. Germany the only one with money in the EU, and last but not least Greece being offered loans from Russia through BRICSA. Don't discount the BRICSA concept the investment of billions has already been made including a build up of a satellite system to get out of swift. I had a great photo of a huge Chinese sign with a advert for the next reserve currency. I will look for it.