The Weather Channel works to change doubter's minds!
Jun 22, 2015 9:59:24 GMT -6
Nugget, dirkgently, and 9 more like this
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2015 9:59:24 GMT -6
It seems the Weather Channel is starting a major new push to get into the minds of us stubborn folk who won't buy their B.S. on climate change.....and pardon me for not being real unbiased. B.S. is B.S. and P.C. just makes a lie a nicer thing by name. It changes nothing for the stink and content of the B.S..
Well, first, they have to explain this new trick to an old dog. See...in the world I grew up in, using public personalities to push buzz phrases and soundbytes is nothing BUT politics. Calling it something else changes nothing, any more than the tactic changes the B.S. underlying it.
After all.. their own founder doesn't buy their B.S..... (Weather Channel boss calls global warming 'the greatest scam in history') Well, ouch! That is a little sticky.... Ahh well.. They are propaganda masters tho! Nothing stops the agenda of progress
Remember now...there is absolutely nothing political at work here. They promise. Not one thing! (turns to cover growing nose) The science is the strategic move. Really! Just about getting out the science.
Although, I will give them credit for one thing. They usually act like John Coleman doesn't even exist, or went criminally insane or something. He at least gets mention in the main article.
Source
Now it isn't all that hard to "reach me" as a skeptic (and that is an understatement). In fact, they only need to honestly, sincerely and openly explain a few minor details...that is all.
#1. What happened to those last 15 years they decided to just erase from the records of averaging, because the LAST 15 years put their models to the test, and they came up very short??
#2. Global Warming fanatics love to pretend this didn't happen or talk like it didn't matter, but that Email gate scandal of OTHER outright fabricated sensor and raw data was never explained. Do so.
#3. Explain, in a way that makes sense and does't include 'trust me' anywhere in it...how warming AND cooling records are consistently being set, world wide? Shouldn't that be warming? (
(If cooler spots go along with proving warming...then how can we be sure the warming isn't just the side product of a COOLING trend? The LAST 15 years leaves an open deba...er..nvm..they erased those)
#4. Explain the failure of previous models to show accuracy on pretty much ANY consequence they have predicted to date, going back to the first runs and scare tactics of the 90's. Ooops don't cut it.
(The only consistency in climate models is being CONSISTENTLY WRONG. That needs explained before I even ENTERTAIN anything from the people who designed the models)
See? Just a few little details....and they don't need some big star filled thing to brainwash us Eric Holder style...or just manipulate us like Government seems to love. Just explain what goes *TILT*, without 'pretending the topics don't exist', as they seem to love to do in redefining the language and range of the topic itself.
....on a more serious note. If the Weather Channel isn't in the business of reporting weather as a plain thing to allow us to remain informed of our daily conditions? I'll take my weather needs elsewhere. These days Weather Underground kicks the tails off W.C. anyway, and has been for quite some time in web presence and power of their tools. :P
The Weather Channel is looking beyond cold fronts and summer showers with a project featuring the voices of 25 prominent people talking about the need to take action on climate change.
The network says its "The Climate 25" series is about science, not politics. But its message is unmistakable, and is consciously designed to reach people who may be doubters about the causes of global warming.
The network says its "The Climate 25" series is about science, not politics. But its message is unmistakable, and is consciously designed to reach people who may be doubters about the causes of global warming.
Well, first, they have to explain this new trick to an old dog. See...in the world I grew up in, using public personalities to push buzz phrases and soundbytes is nothing BUT politics. Calling it something else changes nothing, any more than the tactic changes the B.S. underlying it.
After all.. their own founder doesn't buy their B.S..... (Weather Channel boss calls global warming 'the greatest scam in history') Well, ouch! That is a little sticky.... Ahh well.. They are propaganda masters tho! Nothing stops the agenda of progress
That's an important strategic move, said Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. People skeptical or less knowledgeable about climate change might be turned off by messages from Greenpeace or Al Gore, but be more attentive to business or military leaders they respect, he said.
Remember now...there is absolutely nothing political at work here. They promise. Not one thing! (turns to cover growing nose) The science is the strategic move. Really! Just about getting out the science.
Although, I will give them credit for one thing. They usually act like John Coleman doesn't even exist, or went criminally insane or something. He at least gets mention in the main article.
John Coleman, a former TV meteorologist and a co-founder of The Weather Channel, is a widely quoted climate change skeptic and claimed there are others like him who work now at the network who are afraid to speak up because it would cost them their jobs.
Now it isn't all that hard to "reach me" as a skeptic (and that is an understatement). In fact, they only need to honestly, sincerely and openly explain a few minor details...that is all.
#1. What happened to those last 15 years they decided to just erase from the records of averaging, because the LAST 15 years put their models to the test, and they came up very short??
#2. Global Warming fanatics love to pretend this didn't happen or talk like it didn't matter, but that Email gate scandal of OTHER outright fabricated sensor and raw data was never explained. Do so.
#3. Explain, in a way that makes sense and does't include 'trust me' anywhere in it...how warming AND cooling records are consistently being set, world wide? Shouldn't that be warming? (
(If cooler spots go along with proving warming...then how can we be sure the warming isn't just the side product of a COOLING trend? The LAST 15 years leaves an open deba...er..nvm..they erased those)
#4. Explain the failure of previous models to show accuracy on pretty much ANY consequence they have predicted to date, going back to the first runs and scare tactics of the 90's. Ooops don't cut it.
(The only consistency in climate models is being CONSISTENTLY WRONG. That needs explained before I even ENTERTAIN anything from the people who designed the models)
See? Just a few little details....and they don't need some big star filled thing to brainwash us Eric Holder style...or just manipulate us like Government seems to love. Just explain what goes *TILT*, without 'pretending the topics don't exist', as they seem to love to do in redefining the language and range of the topic itself.
....on a more serious note. If the Weather Channel isn't in the business of reporting weather as a plain thing to allow us to remain informed of our daily conditions? I'll take my weather needs elsewhere. These days Weather Underground kicks the tails off W.C. anyway, and has been for quite some time in web presence and power of their tools. :P
I couldn't possibly agree more.
