We had huge floods around many of the big ice sheets, such as the Laurentide, which blanketed much of arctic Canada east of the Rocky Mountains and southward to the Great Lakes. Huge megafloods were associated with its surrounding lakes, particularly Glacial Lake Agassiz, which covered much of central Canada centered around Winnipeg. That released floods both to the south through the Mississippi River system and also under the ice out through the straits that enter Hudson Bay. There were also massive megafloods in Asia. Some of them were associated with big ice sheets that blocked the rivers that currently flow north from Russia into the Arctic Ocean. Others were associated with mountain areas, such as the Altai Mountains, the Sayan Mountains, and some of the mountains around Lake Baikal. All of these are in southern Siberian Russia, along its borders with Kazakhstan and China and Mongolia. These mountain floods were comparable in magnitude, though perhaps not in volume, to the Missoula floods.
I am unaware of any religion that doesn't make the claim that there was a world wide flood. I have personally found sea shells on Big Bear Mountain in California. I think it is the only common thread with all religions.
I am unaware of any religion that doesn't make the claim that there was a world wide flood. I have personally found sea shells on Big Bear Mountain in California. I think it is the only common thread with all religions.
That's why I refer to "Holy" texts as historical documents rather than the word of God. They are also used quite often to find lost cities as there are many clues in them. It all started out as word of mouth tales passed down through the generations until some discovered the written language and started transcribing it all on stone and it moved on from there.
That's my theory anyways.
Beware the man who has one gun, he probably knows how to use it.
I am unaware of any religion that doesn't make the claim that there was a world wide flood. I have personally found sea shells on Big Bear Mountain in California. I think it is the only common thread with all religions.
That's why I refer to "Holy" texts as historical documents rather than the word of God. They are also used quite often to find lost cities as there are many clues in them. It all started out as word of mouth tales passed down through the generations until some discovered the written language and started transcribing it all on stone and it moved on from there.
That's my theory anyways.
Your theory is as good as anyone else's. There is much written before those things that are considered the word of God. From the times of Ninurta although some things feel similar there is a much different story.
As far as the government scientist was concerned, it was a bit of fluff: an early morning interview about great white sharks last summer with Canada AM, the kind of innocuous and totally apolitical media commentary the man used to deliver 30 times or more each year as the resident shark expert in the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). So he sent an email off to Ottawa notifying department flaks about the request, and when no response had been received by the next morning, just went ahead and did it.
After all, in the past such initiative was rewarded. His superiors were happy to have him grab some limelight for the department and its research, so much so they once gave him an award as the DFO’s spokesperson of the year. But as he found out, things have changed under Stephen Harper’s Conservatives. Soon after arriving at his offices, the scientist was called before his regional director and given a formal verbal reprimand: talk to the media again without the explicit permission of the minister’s office, he was warned, and there would be serious consequences—like a suspension without pay, or even dismissal.
The melting Laurentide Ice Sheet discharged thousands of cubic kilometres of fresh water each year into surrounding oceans, at times suppressing the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and triggering abrupt climate change1–4. Understanding the physical mechanisms leading to events such as the Younger Dryas cold interval requires identification of the paths and timing of the freshwater discharges. Although Broecker et al. hypothesized in 1989 that an outburst from glacial Lake Agassiz triggered the Younger Dryas1 , specific evidence has so far proved elusive, leading Broecker to conclude in 2006 that ‘‘our inability to identify the path taken by the flood is disconcerting’’2 . Here we identify the missing flood path— evident from gravels and a regional erosion surface—running through the Mackenzie River system in the Canadian Arctic Coastal Plain. Our modelling of the isostatically adjusted surface in the upstream Fort McMurray region, and a slight revision of the ice margin at this time, allows Lake Agassiz to spill into the Mackenzie drainage basin. From optically stimulated luminescence dating we have determined the approximate age of this Mackenzie River flood into the Arctic Ocean to be shortly after 13,000 years ago, near the start of the Younger Dryas. We attribute to this flood a boulder terrace near Fort McMurray with calibrated radiocarbon dates of over 11,500 years ago. A large flood into the Arctic Ocean at the start of the Younger Dryas leads us to reject the widespread view that Agassiz overflow at this time was solely eastward into the North Atlantic Ocean
Monument valley comes to mind.. Can you imagine someone stepping out of their teepee early one morning and seeing a wall of water several feet high (maybe even 10s of feet) bearing down upon you ? That early morning piss just got serious, NO?