Loretta Lynch, Obama’s pick for Attorney General.. Why

272sky, I'm Bumping your thread,,,,, Now I want the truth to be out there as to WHY the Obamas Democrats are Race Baiting with this headlines. This is What Obamas Faithful Followers are wanting Americans To Think.
Also What they're not telling you.
Noooooo, Democrats Are Lying to the American Public , Don't Say It's So! Obama Would Never Allow THAT!  He's The Commander in Chief of Lies!

I guess I'll be the odd ball of the group to say...what is the real problem with Lynch?

I read and understand the points made by Orly Taitz. She is also someone I have absolutely no respect for. I don't believe she could define the word integrity or the concept of Good Faith without a dictionary, and then, enough time to spin the definition for public consumption. I mean, this is the self appointed bane of Obama's existence, which wouldn't be so bad a thing for those of us who dislike him so intensely, but Orly has a knack for losing, consistently, and almost without exception in her legal track record. Leaps of logic to cross mighty canyons and making assumptions to define the ass in the head of it, kinda define her career. She's also made it clear she aspires to political office herself...which, given her lack of success in her chosen profession? Colors everything from her with another layer of suspicion.

The enemy of my enemy is NOT necessarily my friend ..and the only thing going for Orly is we both dislike the same guy, rather passionately.

Getting back to Lynch tho (and discarding Orly's "I am rather certain" hedging like she is a gardener or landscaper here), I am curious to know if there are independent and clear records the rest of us could find that substantiate anything shady in Lynch's background? I'd run her a bit (not too seriously) when she first appeared as a nominee, and given the fact Obama WILL name his next AG (I.E....a moderate or conservative will never, ever, happen) then I didn't see anything too far afield about her.

--

What I HAVE seen is a wimpy Republican majority of mushy minds that couldn't articulate a fighting position if they were in a shooting war and going for pure survival. I certainly have heard nothing like a case made against Lynch. If there is one to make, why not make it and vote up/down ...under the Republican majority here...and let that be the end of it? Perhaps...because there is nothing but a left leaning ideology to argue?

I hate it too in this instance, but every President, even this one, has the RIGHT to appoint whomever they please. They could appoint you or me, if Congress were sleepy enough to let it slide past.

Holding up her nomination for CAUSE....would make sense. Holding up her nomination for politics? Well... Nice... Whatever shred of good faith and decent feeling Lynch MAY have held at the start? She'll have none of that when she takes her position now. Republicans have made their own enemy ...and if she were already an enemy? Shes become a righteously angry one with a legitimate beef over being screwed with.

Not exactly effective leadership ...and McConnell is no better than Reid. He's just playing the same childish games under a different color banner...but the nation still loses and loses big in the end.