CHRISTIANS WILL NOT NEED TO IMMEDIATELY RENOUNCE THEIR FAITH

As a Catholic, the whole extraterrestrials bit is a whole lotta "meh" for me.

Is there life elsewhere in the universe? Sure, why not? There's nothing in the Bible about it, so I'm not sure where the arguments that life cannot exist anywhere but Earth come from.

Does it matter? Not really. It would raise interesting questions about the Fall and about being made in the image of God, but in the end, salvation is between you and God, aliens don't really have any relevance. If you read Chesterton and C.S. Lewis, they both speculate on the possibility, but neither of them seem to think it anything more than a speculative thought problem. And that's what Pope Francis has said, as well.

PS: As far as "PROJECT L.U.C.I.F.E.R." goes, recall that the only reference to Lucifer in the Bible is in Isaiah and it clearly is applying that title to the King of Babylon, not Satan. The confusion of Lucifer being Satan arose out of 18th Century Protestants, there is no Biblical basis for it. Prior to them, "Lucifer" was just another name like Frank or Harry.

Dear AiRen,

In my own mind (not necessarily in the minds of specialists) this approach leaves me confused. You mention:

I didn't know we had overwhelming evidence that there even are such critters, let alone in cahoots with anyone. And if they are in cahoots, why would it be the globalists? And while I don't like them at all, I didn't know the globalists were Satanic.

I'm also confused by the belief that the Vatican wants us to obey or worship the "critters." I thought they were saying (as developed over the years), "Science has told us that there may be critters. If they exist and we find each other, what a wonderful way to compare the stories of Creation, the Fall, and Redemption. This could give us a much deeper understanding of God's designs. As we would learn a great deal on these subjects from critters, if they do exist we'd like to talk with them."

That seems harmless to me.

And if the Vatican were combined with the globalists and major governments and their militaries, I'm surprised we don't have a one world government now.

See where my confusion is?

Charles

IN CAHOOTS WITH THE GLOBALISTS
.

1. I consider this item the most logical conclusion AS WELL AS attested to by 100’s of quality witnesses and whistle blowers.

2. Purported documents, books, assertions by a list of purported “ET” critter contacts with government officials have included such goals and plans, REQUIREMENTS to “protect us from ourselves” else mankind will be come ‘extinct’ and the world ‘uninhabitable.’ That’s one purported reason for the global warming nonsense. Not that the world may not be warming—but that man is responsible for it.

3. The goals of the globalists and the goals of the critters toward a one world government and a one world religioni {reportedly under ‘CRITTER’ CONTROL} are essentially identical.

4. Occult globalists have predicted such a liaison, collaboration for centuries.

5. To reach the Biblical declaration of said global government and one world religion IN THE SAME ERA AS ISRAEL BECAME A NATION AGAIN IN THE HOLY LAND . . . REQUIRES A VERY HEAVY DUTY SOMETHING TO COERCE THE CONFLICTING NATIONS AND RELIGIONS TO SUBMIT UNDER ONE AUTHORITY. Imho, ONLY the “ET” charade with backed up ‘miraculous’ technology and ‘supernatural’ demonstrations will do it. I think the Bible hints at that fact.

6. Imho, anyone denying that the globalists are in control covertly AND are very close to springing their global control onto the world stage overtly—anyone denying that is either woefully ignorant, not paying attention or in terminal levels of denial. The evidence has been increasingly abundant for too long, at this point.

7. Deceased author DAVID FLYNN in his compiled 2 books edition of THE DAVID FLYNN COLLECTION: TEMPLE AT THE CENTER OF TIME: Newton’s Bible Codex Finally Deciphered . . . and his CYDONIA: The Secret Chronicles of Mars . . . builds another emphatically strong case about the fallen angels and satanic globalists in cahoots.

8. Crish Putnam and Tom Horn with EXO-VATICANA have a DVD full of documents, ancient, rare documents and footnotes. I’ve never seen a study of anything so meticulously researched and well documented. Nothing else I’ve ever seen reaches even 1/100th that level of thoroughness, imho. They are emphatic about the critters being in cahoots with the satanic globalists and being fallen angels.

9. It is mystifying to me that anyone could read Daniel, Ezekiel, and Revelation . . . and understand even the basic outline of the END TIMES global government and one world religion . . . on the one hand . . . and pay even half attention to the nightly news on the other . . . and conclude ANYTHING ELSE BUT THAT the globalists are very close to the structures and status outlined in Daniel, Ezekiel and Revelation—as they have NEVER BEEN THE LEAST BIT CLOSE TO IN ANY OTHER ERA regardless of all the ignorant blather about “They’ve said this every century for the last 2,000 years.”

10. Israel had to be a nation again in its God-given lands for any of the prophetic mile posts to matter. Besides, only 1-3 SLIGHTLY similar events have occurred in eras in the past. Now, we have many 100’s of such mile posts. There’s been NO OTHER SIMILAR ERA in the last 2,000 years. Nonsense to the contrary is just that—ignorant nonsense.
.

I OFFER SUCH CONCLUSIONS as more or less a starting point for discussion. I really don’t care to argue for the above, per se. I’m happy to discuss the THEREFORE WHAT’s but I’m not very eager to “defend” my conclusions above.
.
My lack of eagerness has nothing to do with the quality of my assertions, per se. It has to do with the dreary idiocies of such back and forth haggling for 9 years at TOS and about that long at another TOS. The other side just never seems to bring even 1/4th the bricks they would need to discuss the topic intelligently.
.

That's not a feather in my cap per se. Nothing for me to be smug about at all. It's just the dreary state of the propagandized mangled, disinformation saturated populace who've been victimized by 99 years of wholesale very deliberate brainwashing by the main stream media.
.

Polite, mutually respectful inquiries for increased understanding of my points is fine. Hostile, disrespectful, contrarian naysaying, argumentiveness is not something I’m inclined to respond well to. I may be grieved that someone would be so uninformed as to be 100% hostile to my conclusions—because of what it will cost them if they hold onto that perspective. But mostly, at this point, I don’t give that much of a rip. I’ve done the work. My conclusions were slowly built up over many decades. I came to some of them kicking and screaming against being forced to that conclusion. But facts are facts. And facts don’t really care that much who believes in them, or not.

Anyway—let the constructive games begin . . .
.
CONTINUED AS I CAN GET TO IT.