Christie looks to election with promise of Social Sec Cuts!
Apr 15, 2015 8:14:46 GMT -6
Glencairn, brotherman, and 3 more like this
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2015 8:14:46 GMT -6
Oh, I gotta say. Of all the candidates out there? This is really *THE* one I most want to see defeated in the primary, so badly, he is reduced to tears by the pounding. Hypocrite would have a picture of his monument to a lack of self control and good judgement. Indeed...a color photo, at that.
That's the spirit! Just as the largest shift if demographics during Americas history as a nation is taking place, to have a majority move into precisely the benefit group he's suggesting need attention, he does everything to piss them off!
err..... He doesn't have the brains God gave a common Goose!
Source
So this mass of excess consumption would do to us, what he's done to his own state and Public Employee Union?? Oh...that was about suicidal in its stupidity with a political career. I have come to personally HATE Public sector union. We get screwed as a captive audience to the tune of whatever corruption dictates we pay. Not cool....but you don't take the peoples PAID-IN retirement from them!
People PAY into Unions for a pension, and people have PAID into Social Security all their lives. Rich or poor, if you work? You pay. Period, and end of point.
The suggestion that having some success in life means the pittance Social Sec actually gives back for a lifetime of taking, somehow be removed? Well....That's very communist of him. A true red communist would be proud in fact. DOWN with the bourgeoisie class! (Even if more of us fit into this way of defining it than would ever stand a test of logic)
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, risking a backlash from older Americans, on Tuesday proposed cutting Social Security retirement benefits for the wealthy as he sought to stand out from a crowded Republican 2016 presidential election field.
With the biggest policy proposal so far among the Republican White House hopefuls, Christie spoke in the early voting state of New Hampshire. He was seen a few months ago as one of the top Republican contenders for the party's nomination but has since been eclipsed by others.
With the biggest policy proposal so far among the Republican White House hopefuls, Christie spoke in the early voting state of New Hampshire. He was seen a few months ago as one of the top Republican contenders for the party's nomination but has since been eclipsed by others.
That's the spirit! Just as the largest shift if demographics during Americas history as a nation is taking place, to have a majority move into precisely the benefit group he's suggesting need attention, he does everything to piss them off!
err..... He doesn't have the brains God gave a common Goose!
"Governor Christie has decided that the only way to rein in entitlement spending is on the backs of seniors. This couldn't be more wrong," Pascrell said in a statement said.
In New Jersey, Christie's administration is appealing after losing in court to unions protesting his decision to strip $1.6 billion from the state's 2015 contribution into the New Jersey public employee retirement system. A similar lawsuit for the state's 2016 contribution has been filed.
In New Jersey, Christie's administration is appealing after losing in court to unions protesting his decision to strip $1.6 billion from the state's 2015 contribution into the New Jersey public employee retirement system. A similar lawsuit for the state's 2016 contribution has been filed.
So this mass of excess consumption would do to us, what he's done to his own state and Public Employee Union?? Oh...that was about suicidal in its stupidity with a political career. I have come to personally HATE Public sector union. We get screwed as a captive audience to the tune of whatever corruption dictates we pay. Not cool....but you don't take the peoples PAID-IN retirement from them!
People PAY into Unions for a pension, and people have PAID into Social Security all their lives. Rich or poor, if you work? You pay. Period, and end of point.
The suggestion that having some success in life means the pittance Social Sec actually gives back for a lifetime of taking, somehow be removed? Well....That's very communist of him. A true red communist would be proud in fact. DOWN with the bourgeoisie class! (Even if more of us fit into this way of defining it than would ever stand a test of logic)