The White House may have overstepped with Obamanet
Mar 16, 2015 9:26:26 GMT -6
Doug, betrayedone, and 1 more like this
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2015 9:26:26 GMT -6
It seems the reaction to the attempt at control over the World Wide Web isn't going well, and it isn't looking good in this humble bunny's opinion. We didn't know what it contained when we knew there was a problem with it, and that was thanks to people inside the FCC. Now that some have had a chance to look more into this? The plot (and BS) thickens a bit ...but also may clarify how this attempt may very well die hard, and in its early stages.
Indeed... This is one of many things now happening outside the system of Legislative and Executive branch balance our nation was built upon. Once again, a royal decree from 'on high' is all that exists to justify or explain the need for this ...and Obama seems to fail at a basic understanding here. He cannot make things happen by personal whim. Not for LONG...anyway. Our system doesn't work like that, and he doesn't own the courts. Not even close to it.
He also seems to really hate capitalism or free markets in any form, whatsoever. Lack of control, it seems, annoys him on a personal level, for his determination to exert control over everything in our nation.
The problem is.....our system doesn't work like he'd imagine it does. Not even with a wanna-be dictator at the helm. If he DID have the courts..it would be different. However, he doesn't, and the courts he has attempted control in have not generally gone the way he'd have liked or expected, I believe. Judges are like that though. They get where they are, then they owe loyalty to no man or ideal. (A good thing, up to this point.)
Source
Judges also, historically, have almost no tolerance for 'flying by the seat of the pants' approaches to national issues where regulatory changes or law is passed for a solution. As it should be, to be realistic about it.
"The World According To Me" just isn't enough basis for what is being done ....it'll just take months or even a year or more for courts to work this all through and get it settled.
“Why is the FCC turning its back on Internet freedom? Is it because we now have evidence that the Internet is not open? No. Is it because we have discovered some problem with our prior interpretation of the law? No. We are flip-flopping for one reason and one reason alone. President Obama told us to do so.”
Indeed... This is one of many things now happening outside the system of Legislative and Executive branch balance our nation was built upon. Once again, a royal decree from 'on high' is all that exists to justify or explain the need for this ...and Obama seems to fail at a basic understanding here. He cannot make things happen by personal whim. Not for LONG...anyway. Our system doesn't work like that, and he doesn't own the courts. Not even close to it.
For starters, the order lacks evidence of why the Internet, the greatest source of innovation in modern times, must now submit to rules written for the monopoly telephone system. The order doesn’t include basic market and economic analysis that courts demand to justify new regulations, especially when an agency reverses its own precedents.
Obamanet rejects the Internet’s key operating principle of permissionless innovation. Under the new rules, entrepreneurs must seek regulatory approval before launching new products and services—or beg for forgiveness afterward.
Obamanet rejects the Internet’s key operating principle of permissionless innovation. Under the new rules, entrepreneurs must seek regulatory approval before launching new products and services—or beg for forgiveness afterward.
He also seems to really hate capitalism or free markets in any form, whatsoever. Lack of control, it seems, annoys him on a personal level, for his determination to exert control over everything in our nation.
The problem is.....our system doesn't work like he'd imagine it does. Not even with a wanna-be dictator at the helm. If he DID have the courts..it would be different. However, he doesn't, and the courts he has attempted control in have not generally gone the way he'd have liked or expected, I believe. Judges are like that though. They get where they are, then they owe loyalty to no man or ideal. (A good thing, up to this point.)
The order admits the FCC doesn’t know what many of its new rules mean. The order says the agency will “watch, learn, and act as required . . . a process that is sure to bring greater understanding to the commission.”
Judges also, historically, have almost no tolerance for 'flying by the seat of the pants' approaches to national issues where regulatory changes or law is passed for a solution. As it should be, to be realistic about it.
"The World According To Me" just isn't enough basis for what is being done ....it'll just take months or even a year or more for courts to work this all through and get it settled.
