The Monkey and the Cat (French title, Le Singe et le Chat) is best known as a fable adapted by Jean de La Fontaine that appeared in the second collection of his Fables Choisies in 1679 (book IX, No. 17). Although there is no evidence that the story existed before the 15th century, it began to appear in collections of Aesop's Fables from the 17th century[1] but is not included in the Perry Index. There are popular idioms derived from it in both English and French with the general meaning of being the dupe of another (e.g., a cat's-paw). Usage of these and reference to the fable have been particularly employed in (although not limited to) political contexts.
Look at the social structure underlying the President Responses behaviors ectra
Now look how Islamic leaders are 'responding'
Under Grand Strategy You have to get your enemy to give you victory
ISIS would be the perfect foil to repair reputations a common enemy
Look how recent events in the US are playing the NC incident with students
It may not be a finished thought but like a politician I smell the game
Iran, Jordan, and Hezbela declaring war on ISIS
Manipulate emotions form a team
Hide other activities
what do you see in this context
It would explain Benghazi from a tactical point (why the one general was relieved with in thirty seconds who was going to send support)
in conclusion ISIS is the perfect Catspaw for a longterm endgame manuver
Thats some pretty long term planning in advance to deal with a terror organization that didn't exist when the planning started. That is if I understand what you're saying, and I am not entirely full of BS.
I'd say there is long term planning but not on the side we'd like or are used to.
Benghazi is a good example. What was that? An attack on a Dipo compound? An attempt to capture a US Ambassador alive? A try at stealing hardware being stored there? Whatever the target at Benghazi? That wasn't the only major lesson of that day and week.
It was regional unrest alright..and they gloss right over that like coordinated and controlled unrest over several nations and an entire region is a normal occurrence. It started on command ...flared about half way through..on command..and it ended on command. Benghazi and the regional unrest right afterward was a nice operational test, early on. Could the elements in different places coordinate on ANY level and be successful?
Their first long term test for what is coming today...was successful. So successful, the morons running this nation at the moment didn't even consider the purpose, outside the obliteration of whatever pissed them off SO badly about the specific mission in Libya.
I swear we assume the other side are simple minded and ignorant, when they use very different tactics, but use tactics proven over a millennia of time for success. It sure beat us in two nations..and counting.
ISIS dates back to about 2011, but the vacuum that has allowed them to flourish is the result of the Iraq War and removal of Saddam Hussein in 2003.
In a sense, the US still supports ISIS, in that they are the only credible threat to the Assad regime in Syria, but otherwise I don't really see any upside to the West from ISIS. On the other hand, apart from their publicized brutality and threats to our allies in the region, we don't have much reason to get rid of them, because they aren't really a threat to the West, either, and attacking them would be playing into their hand, particularly if a battle is lost at Dabiq. If they didn't take hostages and publicly and brutally kill them, we'd probably have nothing to do with them, but theologically, they have to do that stuff because it's what their interpretation of Islam commands them to do, and it brings their prophesied confrontation with "Rome" all the more closer.
Last Edit: Feb 18, 2015 10:09:51 GMT -6 by adjensen
Hernando's Hideaway Plank Owner America's best radio station: wfmu.org | My Reality Remix topics blog: Here
Thats some pretty long term planning in advance to deal with a terror organization that didn't exist when the planning started. That is if I understand what you're saying, and I am not entirely full of BS.
I am starting to get an idea
Along the lines of a chess player long term
If this is true- ISIS as Catspaw
Saudi Arabia had a change of power Another change of power will be coming to an Islamic ruled state _______________________
Several thing are playable here
Their would be a connection to the white house and this chess player verifiable and trackable
Thats some pretty long term planning in advance to deal with a terror organization that didn't exist when the planning started. That is if I understand what you're saying, and I am not entirely full of BS.
I am starting to get an idea
Along the lines of a chess player long term
If this is true- ISIS as Catspaw
Saudi Arabia had a change of power Another change of power will be coming to an Islamic ruled state _______________________
Several thing are playable here
Their would be a connection to the white house and this chess player verifiable and trackable
For some reason I am thinking childhood friends
Very interesting my friend, the only thing that would make this work for me with that long term of a plan would be a CIA thinker having the idea to fund these Jihadis and let them gather strength, putting them all in one place before you exterminate them, the benefits being obvious. Anything that comes out as far as our participation in their creation or funding in their quest for a caliphate might just start Americans shooting here.