Circumcision leads to 46% increase in Autism rate!
Jan 21, 2015 10:52:52 GMT -6
dirkgently, emotionallyincorrect, and 1 more like this
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2015 10:52:52 GMT -6
I think I file this under 'This is what happens when stats are used without context or common sense'.
Source
I re-read this a couple times to be sure I really had what they are trying to convey here ..and I still cannot understand where they make a linkage, as opposed to coincidental factor??
Could it be..Circumcision is more common among some sets than others? For instance, what do they mean, regardless of cultural background?? When did EVERY culture chop chop their babies this way?
Pain? Okay....but then the next line kinda shoots that one to a logical mind..
(Source Above)
According to some... Hmm... Okay..and that leads to a mere characteristic (and not even a defining one at that) of the spectrum that defines Autism. If this has ANYTHING to do with it, as opposed to being a common factor by grouping alone...then shouldn't the procedure do more than 'maybe' contribute to one 'secondary' characteristic?
Call me odd...but I read this and just kinda had a brain freeze. The whole premise just hits me as 'where did they even get this to start from??'
Anyone else left curious on this? How does a strictly cosmetic, external surgical operation without complications or unusual issues...lead to profound developmental issues across a lifetime?
Is it really the chop chop, or the agenda against it, which drove this one?
I'm really curious if anyone has supportive logic to the outcome or, more specifically, the methods and data used here?
"With a total of 4,986 ASD cases, our study showed that regardless of cultural background circumcised boys were more likely than intact boys to develop ASD before age 10 years," the paper said.
The study concluded that circumcision increased the risk of developing ASD by 46%.
Researchers explained that the link between circumcision and autism could be caused by the pain felt during the procedure.
The study concluded that circumcision increased the risk of developing ASD by 46%.
Researchers explained that the link between circumcision and autism could be caused by the pain felt during the procedure.
I re-read this a couple times to be sure I really had what they are trying to convey here ..and I still cannot understand where they make a linkage, as opposed to coincidental factor??
Could it be..Circumcision is more common among some sets than others? For instance, what do they mean, regardless of cultural background?? When did EVERY culture chop chop their babies this way?
Pain? Okay....but then the next line kinda shoots that one to a logical mind..
According to some, painful experiences in babies "have been shown in animal and human studies to be associated with long-term alterations in pain perception, a characteristic often encountered among children with ASD."
According to some... Hmm... Okay..and that leads to a mere characteristic (and not even a defining one at that) of the spectrum that defines Autism. If this has ANYTHING to do with it, as opposed to being a common factor by grouping alone...then shouldn't the procedure do more than 'maybe' contribute to one 'secondary' characteristic?
Call me odd...but I read this and just kinda had a brain freeze. The whole premise just hits me as 'where did they even get this to start from??'
Anyone else left curious on this? How does a strictly cosmetic, external surgical operation without complications or unusual issues...lead to profound developmental issues across a lifetime?
Is it really the chop chop, or the agenda against it, which drove this one?
I'm really curious if anyone has supportive logic to the outcome or, more specifically, the methods and data used here?