Prosecute climate change skeptics! Use RICO Act!
Sept 18, 2015 16:35:14 GMT -6
Nugget, 727sky, and 9 more like this
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2015 16:35:14 GMT -6
Oh.....My.....Goodness. Are we still in the United States of America, or have we gone to the Soviet Union and never been told it happened? This isn't even funny as satire. This is SCARY in ANY free nation.
This...is..illness.
Where does this fear of challenge come from?? If they are so certain of their position? Why such a need to suppress anything which doesn't tow the line?? Even to the point of criminal sanction for speech?
I see....A member of the United States Senate sees a direct comparison to make between the documented deceit of big tobacco and people failing to buy their B.S. on man driven climate change?
Source
I hope no one ever feels the need to question just HOW far into science the pure politics have driven themselves. Science and Politics seem to have a blurry line now that is hard to make out for where one stops and the other starts.
Aside this story was another....
NOAA Massively Ramps Up Their Temperature Fraud Ahead Of Paris
I don't know how credible the second story is. I haven't researched it. I HAVE researched enough with my own two eyes, my own fingers and my own long hours of work to establish the science is anything BUT settled, on even the BASIC levels. The politics are settled...but science doesn't work that way when it isn't being perverted to an agenda.
That's my take, anyway. Science with foundation also has no need to cry for opposing views to be arrested and made to vanish from the public square.
This...is..illness.
The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming.
Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”
Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”
Where does this fear of challenge come from?? If they are so certain of their position? Why such a need to suppress anything which doesn't tow the line?? Even to the point of criminal sanction for speech?
But these riled up academics aren’t the first to suggest using RICO to go after global warming skeptics. The idea was first put forward by Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, who argued using RICO was effective at taking down the tobacco industry
I see....A member of the United States Senate sees a direct comparison to make between the documented deceit of big tobacco and people failing to buy their B.S. on man driven climate change?
This year has been a trying one for global warming skeptics. Earlier this year, Democratic lawmakers began an investigation into scientists who disagreed with the White House’s stance on global warming. Many of these skeptical scientists were often cited by those critical of regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
I hope no one ever feels the need to question just HOW far into science the pure politics have driven themselves. Science and Politics seem to have a blurry line now that is hard to make out for where one stops and the other starts.
Aside this story was another....
NOAA Massively Ramps Up Their Temperature Fraud Ahead Of Paris
I don't know how credible the second story is. I haven't researched it. I HAVE researched enough with my own two eyes, my own fingers and my own long hours of work to establish the science is anything BUT settled, on even the BASIC levels. The politics are settled...but science doesn't work that way when it isn't being perverted to an agenda.
That's my take, anyway. Science with foundation also has no need to cry for opposing views to be arrested and made to vanish from the public square.