What Is The Truth Concerning Our Moon?
Sept 13, 2015 2:25:23 GMT -6
Nugget, 727sky, and 4 more like this
Post by Mystic Wanderer on Sept 13, 2015 2:25:23 GMT -6
There have been different theories over the years regarding the origin of our moon:
(The Moon at its nearest and furthest points of its orbit. Image credit: NASA)
One theory is that the moon formed as a sister world while in orbit around the Earth as the Earth formed.
This theory collapsed due to not being able to explain why the moon lacks iron.
A second theory is that it formed in a part of the solar system where there was little iron, and then it was captured into orbit around the Earth.
This, too, failed when lunar rocks showed the same isotope composition as Earth.
Again, another theory suggested that the young Earth spun so fast that it spun off the moon.
This idea failed when analysis of the total angular momentum and energy involved pointed out that our present Earth-moon system could not form in this manner.
Later, Dr. Robin Canup wrote a Ph.D. thesis in the early 1990’s on the moon's origin and suggested the moon was formed by a giant impact which produced new modeling of the aggregation of the debris into moonlets, and eventually, into the moon itself.
So far, this hypothesis has stood up to 25 years of scrutiny.
But, wait...
Are current theories proving Canup's theory to also be wrong?
Recently, there have been many studies by different individuals who are coming forward saying the moon is artificial.
Impossible, you say?
Listen to the video of an interview by George Noorey with Christopher Knight and Allen Buttler on his Coast to Coast show and see if you still think it is impossible after weighing all the evidence provided.
And, offering another theory, we have a video by Crrow77 ( second video below) stating the moon is simply an illusion... a hologram, and that NASA has never sent anyone above lower Earth orbit, and that the moon landings were fake. He gives his reasons and theories to suggest why this is true. The reader can make up his/her mind AFTER watching the video.
In the second theory listed above, (the moon formed in a part of the solar system where there was little iron, and then it was captured into orbit around the Earth.
This, too, failed when lunar rocks showed the same isotope composition as Earth.) could the reason for the "lunar" rocks having the same isotope composition as Earth be because it WAS a rock from Earth, and NASA has been lying to us all along?!
The next video (directly below), presented by NASA, is discussing testing the Van Allen Belt (begin at the 3:00 mark).
If we already went to the moon, there would be no reason to test the Van Allen Belt again; we have already been through it.
Is NASA telling us the moon landing was a hoax? Could Crrow77 be right?
NASA:
Crrow77:
So, has watching these videos changed your views? What do you think? Please DO NOT REPLY before watching the videos to consider all information provided.
Thank you for watching. Expand your mind to new possibilities!
(The Moon at its nearest and furthest points of its orbit. Image credit: NASA)
One theory is that the moon formed as a sister world while in orbit around the Earth as the Earth formed.
This theory collapsed due to not being able to explain why the moon lacks iron.
A second theory is that it formed in a part of the solar system where there was little iron, and then it was captured into orbit around the Earth.
This, too, failed when lunar rocks showed the same isotope composition as Earth.
Again, another theory suggested that the young Earth spun so fast that it spun off the moon.
This idea failed when analysis of the total angular momentum and energy involved pointed out that our present Earth-moon system could not form in this manner.
Later, Dr. Robin Canup wrote a Ph.D. thesis in the early 1990’s on the moon's origin and suggested the moon was formed by a giant impact which produced new modeling of the aggregation of the debris into moonlets, and eventually, into the moon itself.
So far, this hypothesis has stood up to 25 years of scrutiny.
But, wait...
Are current theories proving Canup's theory to also be wrong?
Recently, there have been many studies by different individuals who are coming forward saying the moon is artificial.
Impossible, you say?
Listen to the video of an interview by George Noorey with Christopher Knight and Allen Buttler on his Coast to Coast show and see if you still think it is impossible after weighing all the evidence provided.
And, offering another theory, we have a video by Crrow77 ( second video below) stating the moon is simply an illusion... a hologram, and that NASA has never sent anyone above lower Earth orbit, and that the moon landings were fake. He gives his reasons and theories to suggest why this is true. The reader can make up his/her mind AFTER watching the video.
In the second theory listed above, (the moon formed in a part of the solar system where there was little iron, and then it was captured into orbit around the Earth.
This, too, failed when lunar rocks showed the same isotope composition as Earth.) could the reason for the "lunar" rocks having the same isotope composition as Earth be because it WAS a rock from Earth, and NASA has been lying to us all along?!
The next video (directly below), presented by NASA, is discussing testing the Van Allen Belt (begin at the 3:00 mark).
If we already went to the moon, there would be no reason to test the Van Allen Belt again; we have already been through it.
Is NASA telling us the moon landing was a hoax? Could Crrow77 be right?
NASA:
Crrow77:
So, has watching these videos changed your views? What do you think? Please DO NOT REPLY before watching the videos to consider all information provided.
Thank you for watching. Expand your mind to new possibilities!
