I don't care if the member had been kicked off TOS. I've been kicked off TOS and, I suppose, by a stretch of the imagination, you could call this my website. (Though we know better.)
The potential problem is the website itself. What's on it? If we wouldn't accept it at Hernando's, I'd need a reason to allow a link to it. There are some websites I want us to stay away from for content reasons.
If it passes that test, would you consider putting the links and websites in a different board? I think we have one in the same general area as our radio show websites.
I don't care if the member had been kicked off TOS. I've been kicked off TOS and, I suppose, by a stretch of the imagination, you could call this my website. (Though we know better.)
The potential problem is the website itself. What's on it? If we wouldn't accept it at Hernando's, I'd need a reason to allow a link to it. There are some websites I want us to stay away from for content reasons.
If it passes that test, would you consider putting the links and websites in a different board? I think we have one in the same general area as our radio show websites. Zorgon and John Lears site. That is one of them. Kind of wondering what exactly is acceptable and what is not. nothing dirty by far or sketchy.
I know Zorgon, Not a problem there in my mind,,, But some people here think I'm Twisted,,,,, insomnia chin jumpy For what it's worth, kdog, has my vote for posting. Anyquestion,,,,,,,, thatsit
Last Edit: Nov 14, 2014 22:07:35 GMT -6 by Deleted
I know Zorgon, Not a problem there in my mind,,, But some people here think Im Twisted,,,,, insomnia chin jumpy For what it's worth, kdog, has my vote for posting. Anyquestion,,,,,,,, thatsit
For what it's worth, I have been out of the game for awhile. But I still do my research and have a few friends around. We keep in touch, in fact it's like I never left. Just picking up were I left off.
I don't think there are ever going to be air tight rules. Without knowing what sort of stuff you're linking to, let me offer the broadest of guidelines.
DRUGS Mention? OK. Glamorize, encourage, describe how to make buy or sell, not so much.
SEX Keep it PG-13. No topless women, simulated sex.
RACE The Klan? No
Nothing illegal, either advocating or selling.
Tell you what. Why don't you PM Guohua or myself with what you're thinking about? I'm shooting in the dark here.
I don't think there are ever going to be air tight rules. Without knowing what sort of stuff you're linking to, let me offer the broadest of guidelines.
DRUGS Mention? OK. Glamorize, encourage, describe how to make buy or sell, not so much.
SEX Keep it PG-13. No topless women, simulated sex.
RACE The Klan? No
Nothing illegal, either advocating or selling.
Tell you what. Why don't you PM Guohua or myself with what you're thinking about? I'm shooting in the dark here.
Pretty much what it boils down to is common sense and not posting anything from a discredited or tacky site, otherwise it will get deleted
We all know what is and is not acceptable, and if Charles deems a link not to be worthy, out it goes. That simple
It doesn't hurt to have some guidelines where links are concerned
We can't have a total free-for-all with no rules Charles can set his standards of what is and is not acceptable and then go from there, which they look very reasonable IMO
Also, some sites may have copyright issues as well But we'll cross that bridge if and when that occurs
